ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Springfree Trampoline v Forostenko"
Episode Synopsis
In this episode we consider the recent case decided by the Queensland Court of Appeal of Springfree Trampoline v Forostenko [2024] QCA 255, which involved a claim brought in negligence and s138 of the Australian Consumer Law against Springfree Trampoline for a trampoline accident on the basis that it was alleged there were safety defects owing to defective warnings given about the trampoline's design features and risks of suffering foot injuries.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
More episodes of the podcast Res Ipsa Loquitur
Bird v DP
18/02/2025
Roberts v Shimmin
11/06/2024
Belgrave Heights v Moore
05/05/2024
Mt Owen v Parkes
21/04/2024
Noureddine v Adlard
14/04/2024
Kozarov v State of Victoria
26/03/2024
Faucett v St George Bank
23/03/2024
Roman Catholic Trusts Corporation v WCB
19/03/2024
Bondi Beach Foods v Chadwick
17/03/2024
Connelly v TAC
10/03/2024
In God we trust