Listen "David Hume & Miracles (Part 1)- The Relevant Background Knowledge"
Episode Synopsis
In this episode, I go over the relevant background knowledge outlining David Hume's famous (or rather infamous) argument against testimonial evidence for miracles. Furthermore, I outline world-renowned Christian philosopher Richard Swinburne's devastating critique of Hume's argument on this front. Finally, I provide a general outline on some background knowledge about the modern philosophical feild known as the "Epistemology of Testimony". In Part 2, I will provide my own in-depth evaluation/analysis, where I refute every single premise of Hume's outdated and utterly fallacious argument- let's just say I will conclusively demonsrate that Hume's argument on miracles lives up to its reputation as an "abject failure"!
More episodes of the podcast Real Seekers
Maximal vs. Minimal/Moderate Fact Approaches w/ Lydia McGrew + Harry Stark Bonus on John Chrysostom
08/01/2026
Happy New Year: Rabyd Atheist's "Rancor Seeker" + Harry Stark Art Parodies (Double Feature)
05/01/2026
Reason & Theology DEBATE: Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? (w/ Juan from Modern Atheism vs. Phil Bair)
26/12/2025
The Shroud Puzzle Solved- w/ William West
19/12/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.