Ever feel like your Power Platform deployments are a black box? You ship an update, hold your breath, and just hope it works across dev, test, and prod. What if you could actually control—and see—every stage of your ALM process using GitHub Actions, with no more guessing or manual patchwork?Let’s pull back the curtain on how each component—source control, automation, and secure variables—really connects. This isn’t just another walkthrough. This is the ‘why’ most guides leave out, so your next deployment doesn’t leave you guessing.Why Power Platform ALM Feels Like a MazeIf you've ever tried deploying a Power App and felt that creeping uncertainty—like something important must’ve slipped through the cracks—you’re not alone. On paper, Power Platform promises easy app development, but behind that friendly façade, ALM is anything but straightforward. A web app deploys from source control, builds in a pipeline, and lands in production with predictable behavior. Power Platform, on the other hand, hides half the logic inside drag-and-drop UIs, connector screens, and formulas you can't see in any Git repo. So even if you follow every step from those high-level admin guides, you still run into odd, hard-to-diagnose failures once business-critical apps leave development.Let’s look at the ALM guides floating around—most of them will walk you through exporting a “solution” zip and importing it somewhere else. Simple enough, right? But the “how” is just one layer. What they skip is the “why”—why does Power Platform deployment break in ways that regular code never does? That’s what causes endless confusion. The root of the problem is that logic, connections, and config in Power Apps aren’t stored like classic code. You’re not just cloning a repo and watching unit tests. So, when you try to move your app, all those hidden dependencies—connections to Outlook, SharePoint, custom APIs—don’t always travel neatly inside that zip file.Here’s the scenario: you get a shiny new app working in the dev environment. You export a solution, import to test, and suddenly half the flows stop working. It’s rarely just a file problem. Instead, connections are pointing to the wrong place, permissions don’t line up, and data policies block connections that seemed fine a few minutes ago. Now imagine doing this across three environments—dev, test, and prod—with each one using different connections, data protection policies, approvers, and admin guards. You can’t copy-paste your way out of it.The research backs up what admins and makers see every week: The majority of failed Power Platform deployments come from missing connector references or mismanaged environment variables. Missing a connector reference just means the flow can’t find its Outlook or Dataverse connection, so the minute you try to run your app or flow in another environment, you get runtime errors. And because environment variables work differently in Power Platform compared to other Microsoft 365 products, they trip up even experienced developers. Variables are supposed to handle endpoints, keys, or tenant-specific configs. But if someone forgets to update them after exporting a solution, even a harmless-looking change can break a live app.A lot of us fall into the same trap at first. You might think exporting a solution zip bundles everything needed, but it actually skips over dynamic connector references. For example, say you have an app that uses an HTTP connector for a third-party service in dev—when you import into test or prod, that exact connector instance won’t exist. The connector reference inside your app points to a missing object, and flows inside the solution quietly break until a user or admin manually recreates and remaps connections. If you have more than one maker or admin, it’s even easier to lose track of which reference goes where, and nobody wants that “it worked in dev” postmortem.Another wrinkle: service principals. Most folks start out using user accounts to export and import solutions, because it’s faster to get started. But when you try to automate with GitHub Actions or any CI system, using a person’s credentials quickly dead-ends. You’ll hit permission walls—sometimes without clear error messages—or even trigger compliance audits, because you’re running critical deployments under a personal account instead of something meant for automation. Service principals—essentially app identities created in Azure AD—handle all the permissions, logging, and auditing your pipeline needs. Without them, your automation chain turns into a patchwork of person-to-person handoffs, and you never know who changed what.Source control turns into a wildcard, too. With regular code, you have commit histories, PRs, and blame tools. Power Platform’s solution files only represent snapshots, which means you’re missing granular change tracking. Logic tucked away in a canvas app’s screen formulas or in lightly documented flows isn’t visible until you export again. Someone tweaks a flow setting in the UI, and good luck finding out why downstream environments suddenly behave differently.The end result? Managing ALM for Power Platform feels like solving a puzzle with half the pieces missing—or at least, hidden under the box. Invisible dependencies, environment-specific connectors, and variables that you can’t see in code all muddle the usual developer workflow. And that’s before you deal with the fact that production environments almost always have stricter permissions, different data policies, and audit requirements that aren’t obvious in dev or test.But here’s the upside: this complexity isn’t random. There’s a practical reason for why Power Platform handles source, variables, and connectors in such a unique way. It tries to let business users build powerful apps without worrying about code. The side effect is you, as the person setting up automation, need to track what’s hiding under the hood. If you know where those invisible wires run, you can fix or avoid most of the footguns that derail Power Platform ALM.Now, if all this sounds like a lot to juggle, you’re not wrong. But there are four ALM pillars that actually help untangle this mess: source, build, test, and deploy. Each has its quirks in Power Platform, but together, they put structure back into what otherwise feels like chaos.The Core ALM System: Source, Build, Test, DeployEvery time someone asks for a Power Platform pipeline that “just works,” the first thing that comes to mind are those four dusty ALM pillars—source, build, test, deploy. In traditional dev land, you could almost run these in your sleep. Power Platform doesn’t let you off that easy. Suddenly, “source” doesn’t mean code; it means wrangling with solution files, exporting zipped bundles packed with apps, flows, and sometimes connectors pretending to be part of the source.Let’s start with the basics, then pick apart what makes each pillar a little strange in this world. You’ve got your solution zip file. It’s not code in the usual sense—open it up, and you’re greeted with XML and JSON explainer files, not the logic you’d spot in TypeScript or C#. But this is the “source” for Power Platform. Teams often get tripped up here. It looks portable until you realize most changes—like updating a formula in a screen or tweaking a flow’s logic—aren’t obvious until you export a fresh solution zip. So yes, you can version these solution files in Git, but unless you’re disciplined about exporting after every relevant edit, your history has glaring gaps.Now comes configuration. For regular apps, you might store connection strings in a config file and call it a day. Power Platform smuggles environment-specific data inside these solutions. It’s not just environment variables—it’s connector references, dynamic endpoints, roles, and permissions bundled alongside the business logic. If you miss updating these before exporting from dev or test, you’re locking in pointers to the wrong place. I’ve watched teams religiously commit their solution zip files, only to deploy and realize half their app is still talking to the dev Dataverse instead of prod, because nobody re-mapped connector references.Then we have build. The word “build” usually brings up images of compiling code and watching green ticks in a CI job. With Power Platform, the build process is about stashing those zip bundles, double-checking schema, and verifying dependencies. In a GitHub Actions pipeline, a build job grabs your committed solution file, then uses Microsoft’s Power Platform CLI to unpack, validate, and repack the solution. The validation step is where the magic—or chaos—happens. It might catch broken references or unsupported actions. Worse, if a change in your flow relies on a custom connector that never made it into source control, your build silently packages something incomplete.Here’s where things get tricky. Those “build” jobs are less about compiling and more about orchestrating a reliable export and making sure what’s inside is shippable. Teams who skip this or rush it quickly land in situations where a build technically “succeeds,” but what ends up in UAT or prod is missing half its intended features. Microsoft keeps pushing the message that “solution files make ALM portable,” but there’s always a footnote: portability depends on connectors being properly mapped and roles set up across environments.Testing is the next sore spot. In a web app pipeline, automated tests might run unit tests or UI checks. For Power Platform, what counts as a “test” is up for debate. Sometimes it’s solution validation—in other words, does the solution open, and do key dependencies resolve? Other times, it’s running test flows or checking that connectors respond in a test environment. A lot of times, testing is manual, because validating business logic inside a canvas app isn’t wired into automated pipelines yet. But you can automate checks to spot missing connectors, validate critical flows, or even ping a test environmeBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/m365-show-podcast--6704921/support.Follow us on:LInkedInSubstack

Ver todos los episodios