החקירה:האם איסורי נזיר מוגדרים כדין השוה בכל — דומיא דנדרים המחייבים כל אדם לשמור את מוצא שפתיו —אושהם דינים הנובעים מ“שם תואר” של נזיר, ואינם שייכים אלא למי שחלה עליו קדושת נזירות?---The Core QuestionThe sugya depends on defining the very nature of Nazirus:> Is Nazirus fundamentally like a neder (a universal halachic mechanism)?Or is it a unique halachic status — a “shem toar” — that the Torah applies only to someone who assumes the role of a Nazir?This distinction determines whether Nazir prohibitions are considered “equal to all” (שוה בכל) or “not equal to all” (אינו שוה בכל).---Side A – Nazirus is like a Neder (Issur Cheftza or Issur Gavra)According to the Mahar"i Ben Lev and Mahar"i Basan:When a person accepts Nazirus, he is creating an issur, either:On the object (wine becomes forbidden), orOn the person (the person becomes prohibited from cutting hair or drinking wine).Result:The mechanism is the same mechanism as nedarim, which applies to everyone.Therefore, even those who never became Nazirīm are bound by the same underlying halachic system:→ Nazir prohibitions count as “שוה בכל.”---Side B – Nazirus is a Halachic Status (“Shem Teva”)According to the Mahariṭ:Nazirus is not an issur-object and not an issur-person in the neder sense.It is a new kedusha-status placed on a person:→ The Torah gives special prohibitions only to one who possesses this status.Result:These laws apply only to people with that status.Therefore:→ Nazir prohibitions are “אינו שוה בכל.”--

Ver todos los episodios