John Ratcliffe, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, is at the center of two fast moving stories this week. First, he publicly backed Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s decision to declassify long guarded House Intelligence Committee materials on Russian activity in the 2016 election. According to CBS News via AOL, a CIA spokesperson said Ratcliffe strongly supports the public release, and that he initiated the declassification process after taking over at the agency this year. The report had been stored at CIA headquarters due to its sensitivity until Ratcliffe returned it to the committee, clearing the way for public disclosure. This move underscores his stated priority of greater transparency and his focus on repairing and elevating human intelligence, a capability he told senators was not where it needs to be. CBS News reporting carried on AOL added that the CIA recently rolled out multilingual recruitment videos to entice sources in Iran, China, and Russia.Second, Ratcliffe issued a rare on the record statement asserting that recent U S airstrikes severely damaged Iran’s nuclear program. The Business Standard reported that Ratcliffe cited a body of credible intelligence, including new reporting from a historically reliable source, indicating several key facilities were destroyed and will take years to rebuild. PBS NewsHour also noted Ratcliffe’s statement in coverage of the White House claim that the strikes obliterated nuclear sites. His assessment pushes back on media accounts citing a preliminary Pentagon intelligence review that suggested core components remained intact and that Iran’s program may have been set back by months rather than years. AOL’s write up summarized that dispute and quoted the Joint Chiefs chairman saying a final damage assessment is still forthcoming.The declassification fight is drawing scrutiny from outside voices as well. The Rocky Mountain Voice reported that the CIA sought heavy redactions as the DNI moved to release Trump Russia files, highlighting internal concerns over protecting sensitive sources and methods even as Ratcliffe advocates for making the documents public.Together, these developments show Ratcliffe shaping two pillars of the agency’s current posture. He is pressing transparency in politically charged historical assessments while emphasizing aggressive collection from human sources. And he is placing the CIA’s analytic voice behind the administration’s claim that Iran’s nuclear infrastructure suffered long term damage, even as the Defense Department’s early assessments are still being finalized.Thanks for tuning in, and do not forget to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.For more http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOtaThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Ver todos los episodios