The past few days have brought unprecedented tension inside the U.S. intelligence community, with CIA Director John Ratcliffe at the center of a controversy that has shaken the agency. Last week, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard stunned the intelligence world by disclosing the identity of a veteran undercover CIA analyst, stripping her security clearance and effectively ending her career. According to NBC News, this action by Gabbard alarmed the CIA workforce and sparked what insiders now call the most serious clash in years between the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency.Multiple news outlets have reported that the analyst whose name was disclosed played a key role in preparing White House officials for the recent Alaska summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The analyst was scheduled for a new overseas posting, but after the summit and the security clearance revocation, her assignment was canceled. Intelligence insiders told SpyTalk that this move is seen as retribution within an ongoing campaign to remove those perceived as disloyal to the current administration.The disclosure is also the latest episode in an escalating feud between Gabbard and Ratcliffe. Gabbard announced the removal of clearances from 37 current and former intelligence professionals, a move she said was done at President Trump's direction to punish what she called the politicization or weaponization of intelligence. President Trump publicly praised Gabbard days later, noting her efforts had uncovered interesting things and suggesting her star is rising within his circle.NBC News reports that some former U.S. officials interpret Gabbard's recent actions as part of her effort to regain President Trump’s trust after falling out of favor earlier in the year. They believe she aimed to impress the President by exposing what she claims are Democratic operatives or political opponents inside the intelligence community, even if that meant challenging the CIA directly.Director John Ratcliffe, for his part, has not commented publicly on the removal of the analyst, but colleagues describe a mood of deep concern and uncertainty within the Agency. Sources throughout the intelligence community say the controversy has amplified fears about the unpredictable nature of personnel purges and the dangers posed by high-level political infighting—a dynamic not seen since the role of Director of National Intelligence was first established after the September eleven attacks.Thank you for tuning in and be sure to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.For more http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOtaThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

Ver todos los episodios