ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.
Listen "Episode 61: Effective Immediately!"
Episode Synopsis
This week's guest is Dineen Wasylik (https://ip-appeals.com/attorney-profile-dineen-pashoukos-wasylik/) of the DPW Legal (https://ip-appeals.com) law firm in Wesley Chapel, Florida.
Dineen is the founder of the Florida Appellate Procedure Blog (https://floridaappellate.com).
The Florida Supreme Court, on its own motion, amended Rules 1.530 and 12.530 to require, effective immediately, that “To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule.” This represents a significant change in some appellate districts.
Read Dineen's blog post (https://floridaappellate.com/2022/08/30/rule-change-rehearing-required-to-preserve-challenge-to-sufficiency-of-trial-court-findings/) on this issue.
See also, Engle v. Engle, 277 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (https://casetext.com/case/engle-v-engle-9), discussed in the episode.
Your host is Duane Daiker (https://www.shumaker.com/professionals/A-D/duane-a-daiker), a board certified appellate lawyer in the Tampa office of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP (https://www.shumaker.com). You can reach him at: [email protected] ([email protected]).
Please support our sponsor: Court Surety Bond Agency (http://courtsurety.com/). CSBA is the nation's leading surety agency specializing in supersedeas bonds. (877-810-5525).
If you love the show, feel free to Buy Me a Coffee (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Daiker)!
Please follow the show on Twitter (https://twitter.com/IssuesonAppeal), and consider subscribing and rating the show on iTunes. Special Guest: Dineen Wasylik.
Dineen is the founder of the Florida Appellate Procedure Blog (https://floridaappellate.com).
The Florida Supreme Court, on its own motion, amended Rules 1.530 and 12.530 to require, effective immediately, that “To preserve for appeal a challenge to the sufficiency of a trial court’s findings in the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule.” This represents a significant change in some appellate districts.
Read Dineen's blog post (https://floridaappellate.com/2022/08/30/rule-change-rehearing-required-to-preserve-challenge-to-sufficiency-of-trial-court-findings/) on this issue.
See also, Engle v. Engle, 277 So. 3d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (https://casetext.com/case/engle-v-engle-9), discussed in the episode.
Your host is Duane Daiker (https://www.shumaker.com/professionals/A-D/duane-a-daiker), a board certified appellate lawyer in the Tampa office of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP (https://www.shumaker.com). You can reach him at: [email protected] ([email protected]).
Please support our sponsor: Court Surety Bond Agency (http://courtsurety.com/). CSBA is the nation's leading surety agency specializing in supersedeas bonds. (877-810-5525).
If you love the show, feel free to Buy Me a Coffee (https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Daiker)!
Please follow the show on Twitter (https://twitter.com/IssuesonAppeal), and consider subscribing and rating the show on iTunes. Special Guest: Dineen Wasylik.
More episodes of the podcast Issues on Appeal
Going Solo
03/11/2025
Episode 70: Appellate Bond Mistakes
17/06/2024
Episode 63: Can I Hear You Now?
27/03/2023
Episode 62: What Might the Sixth Do?
10/11/2022
In God we trust