Security Architectures: Zero Trust vs Defence in Depth

16/01/2026 28 min

Listen "Security Architectures: Zero Trust vs Defence in Depth"

Episode Synopsis

The podcast dicussion provides an extensive comparative analysis of two major cybersecurity paradigms: Defence in Depth (DiD) and Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA). It explains that traditional DiD, which relies on a layered, location-centric approach with an implicit trust zone once the perimeter is breached, is strategically inadequate for modern distributed environments due to the risk of uncontained lateral movement by attackers. In contrast, ZTA is presented as the essential evolution of technical security, built on the principle of "never trust, always verify," which mandates continuous, explicit verification for every resource access attempt. The document details ZTA’s core components, such as the Policy Engine (PE) and micro-segmentation, arguing that this architecture drastically reduces the blast radius and Mean Time to Contain (MTTC) during a breach, making it critical for hybrid and multi-cloud security. Ultimately, it recommends adopting ZTA not as a replacement, but as the indispensable, modern technical layer within a broader DiD strategy.

More episodes of the podcast InfoSec Bites