Listen "Episode 0x1E: Our Non-Profits Considered "
Episode Synopsis
Karen and Bradley discuss recent debates about the value of
non-profit organizations for Free Software.
Show Notes:
Segment 0 (00:34)
Fontana
(and other Red Hat employees) pointed out some imprecision in what
Bradley said in Episode
0x1D about Debian non-free. (01:07)
A call for
participation has been
announced for the Legal
and Policy Issues DevRoom at FOSDEM 2012. Please submit a
proposal by 30 December 2011 (04:30)
A recent debate about non-profits started, initiated by a blog post
called Apache
Considered Harmful. (12:55)
Karen and Bradley briefly mentioned that some now believe
that Considered Harmful Considered Harmful
(13:16)
A long thread on this issue occurred on the FLOSS Foundations mailing
list (13:45)
Bradley made an official Conservancy Blog post about the value of
non-profits for Free Software (14:17)
Sourceforge
became proprietary software in 2001, as is well-described in this
by The Sourceforge
proprietarization debacle is well described in an article by Loïc
Dachary. (19:19)
Bradley mentioned FaiFCast Episode 0x11,
which discussed the OpenOffice.org/Apache/LibreOffice
situation. (44:35)
Bradley pointed out that this debate conflates a lot of different
issues, and tried to list all the conflated questions here:
Should a non-profit home decide what technical infrastructure is
used for a software freedom project? And if so, what should it be?
If the projects doesn't provide technological services, should
non-profits allow their projects to rely on for-profits for
technological or other services?
Should a non-profit home set political and social positions that
must be followed by the projects? If so, how strictly should they be
enforced?
Should copyrights be held by the non-profit home of the project, or
with the developers, or a mix of the two?
Should the non-profit dictate licensing requirements on the
project? If so, how many licenses are ok?
Should a non-profit dictate strict copyright provenance
requirements on their projects? If not, should the non-profit at least
provide guidelines and recommendations?
Send feedback and comments on the cast
to <[email protected]>.
You can keep in touch with Free as in Freedom on our IRC channel, #faif on irc.freenode.net, and
by following Conservancy on
identi.ca and and Twitter.
Free as in Freedom is produced by Dan Lynch
of danlynch.org.
Theme
music written and performed
by Mike Tarantino
with Charlie Paxson on drums.
The content
of this
audcast, and the accompanying show notes and music are licensed
under the Creative
Commons Attribution-Share-Alike 4.0 license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
More episodes of the podcast Free as in Freedom
FOSSY 2023
05/07/2023
0x6C: Even More DMCA Exemption Requests!
09/03/2021
0x6A: Live Show from SeaGL 2019
31/03/2020
0x68: Molly De Blanc at CopyleftConf 2019
31/05/2019
0x66: The End of Hellwig vs. VMware
22/04/2019
0x65: Linux Foundation's Community Bridge
02/04/2019
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.