This is the fourth episode of the Flush to Data podcast. We start of discussing open science. We venture into many related aspects such as scientific reproducibility, scientific career evaluation, software versioning, and the distinction between the scientific process and academic institutes.Hosts: Jörg Rieckermann and Kris VillezGuest: Juan Pablo Carbajal (Hochschule für Technik Rapperswil, Rapperswil, Switzerland)Links:* Juan Pablo's web page: https://sites.google.com/site/juanpicarbajal/* OSF - Open Science Framework: https://www.cos.io/our-products/osf* A publication on the scientific mission: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161%2Fcib.1.1.6285 * Open peer review: https://peercommunityin.org/ * Book "On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales from the Front Lines of Science ": https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s7j4* Goodhart's law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart's_lawEpisode guide:[00:00:19] Typical approach to sharing of scientific results today vs. new approaches[00:07:20] Is the product of science a pdf document?[00:11:15] Juan Pablo's approach to producing and sharing results[00:19:50] Pre-register your study and methods to mitigate the risk of (inadvertent) p-hacking[00:27:10] Utility of open data, FAIR principles, copyright, licenses, sensitive data[00:45:50] Open peer review[00:54:10] Evaluating scientific careers[01:04:55] Practical measures to achieve the goals of open science[01:07:40] Science is ...[01:08:35] Closing main session[01:09:10] Start bonus session[01:09:15] Is open science a sad story?[01:11:50] Publish or perish[01:15:25] Creating knowledge is easier than ever - Can open science be weaponized?[01:24:04] Why do we publish? Why do we stay in the system?

Ver todos los episodios