Listen "4. CFM: Matthew 2 and Luke 2"
Episode Synopsis
Original title: The "Why" of WorshipIn this episode, Brendon and Skyler discuss the third lesson in the LDS Come, Follow Me sunday school manual. This week (January 9-15) covers Matthew 2 and Luke 2 - and is titled "We Have Come To Worship Him."CORRECTION: Brendon mentioned the Dead Sea Scroll discovery had "multiple full Isaiah scrolls." The correct information is that the findings included one full Isaiah scroll, with a few small damaged spots, and several more fragments of Isaiah in addition to the full scroll. The point stands that scholars recovered nearly the full text of Isaiah, and the "plain and precious things" apparently recovered by Smith are not in the text. Smith's claim that truths were lost from Isaiah, therefore, should be considered false.Moreover, some of the italics (added by the KJV translators) and even some of the errors from the 1769 edition of the KJV translation of Joseph Smith's day were copied over into the Book of Mormon. Along similar lines, the Sermon on the Mount which is fully copied into the Book of Mormon was later "corrected" by Joseph Smith in the JST, thus leaving alleged errors from Matthew in the Book of Mormon, as well.LDS sources mentioned:Manual for Individuals and Families (under section Ideas for Personal Scripture Study)The Light of Christ (Boyd K. Packer)Two Lines of Communication (Dallin H. Oaks)Resources:Pastor Brendon's recent sermon on Matthew 2: The Wise Will WorshipStart With Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone To Take Action by Simon SinekAmerican Awakening: Identity Politics and Other Afflictions of Our Time by Joshua MitchellThe Person of Jesus by J. Gresham MachenConfessions by AugustinePodcasts: The Visit of the Magi, and The Exodus of the Son of GodJesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes by Kenneth Bailey (also: here, here, here, and here)Sermons: Simeon's Gift and Hopes and FearsDocumentary: Fragments of TruthFor a visual presentation of an example of the trustworthiness of a key part of Isaiah, see 22:07-25:14 of this. (Jason Wallace)A few good articles here, here, and here.Scribes and Scripture by John Meade and Peter GurryMyths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism, edited by Elijah Hixson and Peter GurryOn the general issue of historical reliability: here, here, here, here and here - and on Matthew's citations: here.Contrary to some voices out there, Matthew is (itself) a historical source of the killing of the innocents in Bethlehem. Even within his own family, King Herod killed his own brother-in-law, mother-in-law, his "favorite" wife and three of his own sons based on (real or imagined) threats to his own power. This reportedly became even a joke in Rome when Augustus quipped that he would rather be Herod's pig than his son. Quoting scholar R.T. France - these events do, in fact, "fit in general terms into our knowledge of the history of the period...[T]he nature of the events (Herod's ruthless and paranoid defense of his throne and the attraction of Egypt as a place of political asylum) fits well with what we know of the period."
More episodes of the podcast Distinctive Christianity
189. David Talcott on Plato
24/11/2025
188. John Oswalt on the Book of Kings
17/11/2025
187. Mitchell Chase on the Book of Ruth
10/11/2025
184. Marcus Mininger on Romans 1:16-3:26
30/10/2025
183. Clinton Arnold on Colossians
27/10/2025
182. Stephen Haynes on Noah's Curse
20/10/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.