Listen "Defining Ethnography"
Episode Synopsis
A bite sized introduction which is inevitably reductionistic
Ethnography has various facets (Walford, 2008) and each journal article or book tells a different tale about it. There is a wide-ranging discussion about the nature of ethnography, which, for a novice researcher, makes the matter difficult to navigate (Conteh, 2005 et al.; Delamont, 2009; Hammersley, 1992, 2003; Hammersley & Atkinson, 2009).
During an introductory ethnography seminar I was confronted with the following statement:
The prime ethnographic skills cannot be communicated or learned in the seminar room or out of the textbook. Students can be prepared, forewarned, or educated in ethnography, but the only way to learn it is to do it. (Ball, 1990, pp. 157-158)
Troman and Jeffrey (2006, pp. 34–35) suggest the following three principles of ethnography firstly fieldwork needs to take place over a period of time so that contradictory situations can emerge. Secondly, the research has to take into account the cultural context of the research site and the position the participants hold in this context. Thirdly, the research ought to include theoretical perspectives during research and analysis. The main points I take out from this are to permit enough time at the research site to encounter ambivalent patterns of behaviour. Acknowledging the process of data collection, and rewriting as analytical process that establishes the dialectic between the researcher, the data, and the field.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Self-doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 3(2), 157–171.
Hammersley, M. (1992). What's wrong with Ethnography? Oxon: Routledge.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2009). Ethnography. Principles in Practice. (3rd Ed.). London: Routledge.
Troman, G., & Jeffrey, B. (2006). Time for Ethnography. In G. Troman, B. Jeffrey & D. Beach (Eds.), Researching Education Policy: Ethnographic Experiences. (pp. 22–36). London: Tufnell Press.
Walford, G. (2008). The Nature of Educational Ethnography. In G. Walford (Ed.), How to do Educational Ethnography. (pp. 1–15). London: The Tufnell Press.
Ethnography has various facets (Walford, 2008) and each journal article or book tells a different tale about it. There is a wide-ranging discussion about the nature of ethnography, which, for a novice researcher, makes the matter difficult to navigate (Conteh, 2005 et al.; Delamont, 2009; Hammersley, 1992, 2003; Hammersley & Atkinson, 2009).
During an introductory ethnography seminar I was confronted with the following statement:
The prime ethnographic skills cannot be communicated or learned in the seminar room or out of the textbook. Students can be prepared, forewarned, or educated in ethnography, but the only way to learn it is to do it. (Ball, 1990, pp. 157-158)
Troman and Jeffrey (2006, pp. 34–35) suggest the following three principles of ethnography firstly fieldwork needs to take place over a period of time so that contradictory situations can emerge. Secondly, the research has to take into account the cultural context of the research site and the position the participants hold in this context. Thirdly, the research ought to include theoretical perspectives during research and analysis. The main points I take out from this are to permit enough time at the research site to encounter ambivalent patterns of behaviour. Acknowledging the process of data collection, and rewriting as analytical process that establishes the dialectic between the researcher, the data, and the field.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delamont, S., Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Ethnography. London: Sage.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Self-doubt and soft data: social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 3(2), 157–171.
Hammersley, M. (1992). What's wrong with Ethnography? Oxon: Routledge.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2009). Ethnography. Principles in Practice. (3rd Ed.). London: Routledge.
Troman, G., & Jeffrey, B. (2006). Time for Ethnography. In G. Troman, B. Jeffrey & D. Beach (Eds.), Researching Education Policy: Ethnographic Experiences. (pp. 22–36). London: Tufnell Press.
Walford, G. (2008). The Nature of Educational Ethnography. In G. Walford (Ed.), How to do Educational Ethnography. (pp. 1–15). London: The Tufnell Press.
More episodes of the podcast Designing SoTL Projects
Voice instead of Voice Over in SoTL
26/01/2022
Ethics Form 04: Participant Recruitment
01/03/2021
Ethics Form 03: Methodology and Methods
01/03/2021
Ethics Form 02: Justification
01/03/2021
Ethics Form: 01--Risk Mitigation
01/03/2021
What ethical risks are there in SoTL
22/02/2021
Methodology
16/02/2021
Focus Groups & Group Discussion
27/01/2021
Visual Research Methods an Example
27/01/2021
Soundbite Visual Research Methods
27/01/2021
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.