By siding with Moscow on key UN resolutions concerning Ukraine, Washington has signaled a major shift in its foreign policy. The Trump administration's move, framed as prioritizing diplomacy over confrontation, raises questions about the US's long-term strategy and the potential fallout for its allies.The recent vote at the UN General Assembly over the Ukraine conflict exposed deep divisions in international politics. Ukraine, supported by European countries, presented a resolution titled "Advancing a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace." However, experts argue that the resolution's wording was confrontational.
The US, on the other hand, proposed a brief "Path to Peace" draft. This focused on mourning the casualties, reaffirming the UN's role in peacekeeping, and calling for an end to hostilities without directly blaming Russia. In turn, Russia tried to amend Ukraine's resolution by calling for an assessment of the conflict's root causes.
Moreover, the Assembly passed Ukraine's resolution with 93 votes in favor, 18 against, and 65 abstentions. This implies a decline in support compared to earlier votes, revealing a clear shift, with many Global South countries, including African nations, abstaining or voting against the resolution. Does the growing reluctance to take a strong stance against Russia by African countries signal a deeper geopolitical shift, with countries prioritizing strategic alliances and economic interests?

Ver todos los episodios