Listen "Justice and Peace"
Episode Synopsis
Northern Ireland's largest cross-community victims' group, Wave Trauma Centre, has written to Boris Johnson opposing the idea of a “de-facto amnesty” for Troubles-related prosecutions, after the cases of two Army veterans facing murder charges were dropped. It follows reports that the government has been considering a ban on all prosecutions prior to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement under a statute of limitations, focusing instead on information retrieval for the families of those killed. Most people will never be in a position to understand the pain of losing a loved one unlawfully. How do we weigh their need for justice, against the need to build a lasting peace in the community? Many families regard immunity from prosecution as an insult to victims on all sides, and a betrayal of those who are committed to justice. While others believe it is time to put future peace ahead of past injustice, with an 'amnesty' that centres on 'truth recovery'. Are prosecutions always central to any notion of justice? Does the pursuit of justice or peace always require trade-offs or is it impossible to achieve one without the other, as the anti-racist slogan “No Justice, No Peace” suggests? What role, if any, does forgiveness play? What lessons can be learned from post-conflict societies around the world? With Brian Rowan, Sandra Peake, Bonny Ibhawoh and Selina Stone.Producer: Dan Tierney.
More episodes of the podcast Moral Maze
Politics: Whose Morality Is It Anyway?
26/11/2025
What should we expect from a father?
13/11/2025
Is democracy a failed experiment?
01/10/2025
To know or not to know?
18/09/2025
Is ‘net zero’ a moral pursuit?
11/09/2025
What is the moral value of disgust?
28/08/2025
ZARZA We are Zarza, the prestigious firm behind major projects in information technology.